|
2. Background"My story had an ending one might call tragic, since the heroine surrenders to death. She in a sense is transcending her mortal self; she arises above her particularity and she's going to ascend to death. She looks out from the screen door, and she sees the organic world, which is the world from which we come, and we're composed of, and she's going to go to that world and she's going to die. A man has come for her, a rapist, and he's going to kill her." (Chat with Joyce Carol Oates, http://www.salon.com/06/departments/litchat2.html) 2.1. Charles Schmid, the Pied Piper of TucsonThe story is loosely based upon the true story of Charles Schmid, born 1942, a serial killer in Tucson, Arizona, called the "Pied Piper of Tucson". He was able to lure girls into being with him, until he finally killed one girl and two sisters later. He was finally caught through a confession of a former confidante, convicted for life and killed in jail by other inmates in 1975. When he killed the first girl, Alleen Rowe, he lured her out of her house, a friend of his waiting in the car. "Smitty" wore stuffed boots and virtually talked his victim into his car. He also claimed to have some hallucinogenic or psychic powers. Joyce's writing the story was influenced by these happenings and the above cited Bob Dylan song: "Oates had read part of the article printed in Life magazine and thought this killer was such a strange character, with his stuffed boots and awkward gait. Yet to her mind, he embodied something elusive about adolescent culture and its hidden dangers. That such a man had somehow charmed three teenage girls whom he subsequently killed inspired her to write a short story from the point of view of a potential victim. What would it take, she wondered, for a young girl to be lured by a man who obviously had little going for him? What might he have said and done to win her trust and get her to walk straight into her doom? The story came to Oates 'more or less in a piece' after reading the article and hearing Bob Dylan's song, 'It's All Over Now, Baby Blue.' She was reminded of folk legends of 'Death and the Maiden' and saw within this situation in Tucson an archetypal element. She dedicated her story to Dylan and used some of the words from his song." (Katharine Ramsland, "Charles Schmid, the Pied Piper of Tucson", Crime Libraries Online, http://www.crimelibrary.com/serial2/schmid/index.htm) 2.2. The Secret Code – "33, 19, 17" [41]Old Testament, counting backwards, the 33rd section is Judges. Chapter 19, verse 17:
(solution proposal by Randy Souther, http://storm.usfca.edu/~southerr/archive024.html) 2.3. Bob Dylan: "It's all over now, Baby Blue" [1965]
You must leave now, take what you need, you think will last.
The highway is for gamblers, better use your sense.
All your seasick sailors, they are rowing home.
Leave your stepping stones behind, something calls for you.
2.4. Psychological AspectsEspecially in the later parts of the story, Connie changes in the face of the inevitable. The conditions observable with her may be described as
|
3. Thoughts and Questions on the textConnie:Connie is torn between growing out of her childhood and growing into being a women. She still has retained a certain amount of child-like behavior, but tries to be more adult, especially in talking to Arnold Friend. As a child, she still lives with her parents and is strongly dependent upon them, mostly upon her mother. As an incipient adult woman, she starts to care about her outfit and about boys. This strange guy from the bar coming to her home, taking her for a ride, that's the high time of her day. She is proud of his remembering her, and her initial reservedness perhaps resulting from her playing "hard to get". This changes when she notices something fake about Arnold Friend, something which makes her want to quit the conversation. The turn, however, takes place too late, Arnold Friend already has her in his hold. Having realized the danger, she chooses to give in, protecting her innermost self by falling into some state of trance or sleepwalking, distancing herself from her body. Arnold Friend, death, becomes her solution. There's also a theory that the story may be a story of drug use (Kapper, "A Virgin in the Backseat Smoking Hash", see resources below), that this would explain the strange detachment and sleepwalking of Connie at the end. How could this proposal be supported or refuted? Arnold Friend:Arnold Friend is much older than Connie and cannot be said to be a child anymore, yet he lures Connie out by using imagery from childhood. He talks to her partly like a lover and a person of authority, he fakes listening to her and guides the "conversation" into the direction favored by him. His strange and even funny attire, most of all his boots, may serve to ridicule him, making him thus appear less threatening, like a clown perhaps. Oates constantly referres to him as "Arnold Friend" while she could've easily used pronouns. Thus she underlines the overwhelming presence of Arnold Friend, he is the nemesis, the avatar of evil, at the end, the synonym for (violent) death. Like a puppet master he controls her strings, pushes her into doing something she would never do consciously (cf. also the X-Files episodes 3x17 "Pusher" and 5x08 "Kitsunegari"). As the text is based upon a true story, to what an extent can Arnold Friend be said to be a version of Charles Schmid? Where does fact meet fiction? Could the end of the story also be ambiguous and leading to a more positive outcome, like in the movie? Or is this solution already ruled out through the criminal case? Ellie and Arnold Friend:Ellie, Arnold Friend's partner, may partly serve as a comic relief both for the story and for Arnold Friend. Arnold Friend constructs Ellie as someone strange, even dangerous. Ellie is the mysterious stranger in the background, he controls the music and also opts for cutting the phone line. By repeated shutting him up, Arnold Friend creates the illusion for Connie that he himself keeps Ellie – the alleged bad guy – in control. It may be a game of good cop – bad cop; a charade to convince Connie that she'd be safe with Arnold Friend, that Arnold Friend would succeed in protecting her from the strange maniacal Ellie. Arnold Friend constructs himself as her only hope, her universe, her escape – through invoking fear, he estranges her even from her house and surroundings, at the end, he leaves her no choice but to stick to the last certainty in her life: him. What other function could Ellie have? LanguageA children's perspective needs certain means to achieve it and to recognize it. There is use of children's speech in it, as when Arnold Friend tries to appeal to Connie's simple kid's self, but this is something used artificially by Arnold Friend. Connie, the kid, doesn't really use kid's language that much, but she draws on child-like concepts and child-like worries (see quotes). Oates uses relatively simple language, alternating between being factual and between putting the scope of her narration more closely into the mind of the characters, she sometimes zooms into the actual thoughts and fears (as when Connie's perception changes), while on other occasions being rather detached. The perspective of the narrator in the text, however, is largely Connie's. What further means of language can be examined in the text? StructureAs a short story, the text rather jumps into the situation, giving only the most necessary details about the characters. The smooth talk is the main conflict. If ever, in how far is the ending surprising? |
4. Other points for discussion / questions
|
5. Text and Web Resources:Text and Criticism:
Web Resources:
The Film Adaptation:
(All internet links last checked and accessed May 4th 2000) |
|
|
| ||||||||||||
|
|
|